Mumbo Jumbo, by Ishmael Reed, takes a very
unique and critical view of western civilization, and claims that as we move
away from our roots and focus on the advancement of technology and so-called “progress,”
we lose some of our human spirit. It suggests that we live in an almost “Brave
New World-esque” culture, devoid of passion, in which any sort of spontaneity or
excitement, such as that embodied by Jes Grew, is not only frowned upon, but
feared. This opposition to Jes Grew is led by the Wallflower Order, an
organization that seeks to keep Jes Grew in check and maintain order in
society. In the book, Reed portrays this Wallflower Order as the villain, and those
who welcome Jes Grew, such as PaPa LaBas, as heroes. In my opinion, however,
Reed’s argument goes a little too far.
Consider, for example, his
description of the headquarters of the Wallflower Order in Chapter 17. “You
have nothing real up here. Everything is polyurethane, Polystyrene, Lucite,
Plexiglas, acrylate, Mylar, Teflon, phenolic, polycarbonate. A gallimaufry of
synthetic materials. Wood you hate. Nothing to remind you of the Human Seed”
(62). To begin, this idea of the “Human Seed” has the same problem as the
slogan “Make America Great Again” – during the time of the Human Seed, we were
hunter-gatherers who had to fight tooth and nail for survival, and we never had
time to develop the culture of music, dance, and art that Jes Grew represents. It
was only through technology and developments in agriculture that we were able
to amass a surplus of food, giving us enough free time away from the fields to start
the wave of Jes Grew. Secondly, the “gallimaufry of synthetic materials” Reed
lists deserves praise rather than criticism. Just as the ancients used the
resources they had to build buildings out of wood, we are using our resources
to build buildings out of the most effective materials possible. Indeed, there
is nothing natural about living in a wooden house – hypothetically, if we told
some aliens that we sheltered under a plant cut into a bunch of pieces and
stuck together with mud, they would laugh. We built wooden houses for millennia,
however, simply because they were the most prudent and effective form of
shelter. Similarly, our current buildings are made out of the best materials we
have at our disposal. Whether these are synthetic or not is a non-issue, and
while we don’t hate wood, it would be unwise to use it, given that we have
better materials at hand.
The end of this
description, from my point of view, is just as shortsighted. Reed says that “the
Atonists got rid of their spirit 1000s of years ago with Him (…). Death will
have taken over. Why is it Death you like? Because then no 1 will keep you up
all night with all that racket dancing and singing. The next morning you can
get up and build, drill, progress putting up skyscrapers and … and … and …
working and stuff. You know? Keeping busy” (62 – 63). First of all, the idea
that we work just to “keep busy” is ridiculous. I’m sure that Reed enjoyed his
work as an author, and that he didn’t write Mumbo
Jumbo just to keep busy. Indeed, many people are truly passionate about
their work, and they get the same surge of excitement from reading a
thought-provoking article or making a surprising discovery as one might get
from catching Jes Grew. I find it extremely naïve to say that just because someone
doesn’t show their excitement on the outside by singing or dancing, they have
no spirit and are essentially dead. The second half of Reed’s statement, where
he criticizes “progress” as being pointless, and says that doing things like
building skyscrapers is progress solely for the sake of progress, is just as
bad, but perhaps excusable. Reed wasn’t to know when he wrote the book in 1972 that
the modern analog of Jes Grew is a result of technology, and that the
discoveries of those soulless Atonist scientists he just adores would lead to
something called the internet, to YouTube, to iTunes, and so on. Indeed, in
hindsight, we see that it was actually the “progress” so loathed by those who
got caught up in Jes Grew that led to music being so widespread in this day and
age, and that opened up the western world to cultures all across the globe. Mumbo Jumbo, by Ishmael Reed, takes a very
unique and critical view of western civilization, and claims that as we move
away from our roots and focus on the advancement of technology and so-called “progress,”
we lose some of our human spirit. It suggests that we live in an almost “Brave
New World-esque” culture, devoid of passion, in which any sort of spontaneity or
excitement, such as that embodied by Jes Grew, is not only frowned upon, but
feared. This opposition to Jes Grew is led by the Wallflower Order, an
organization that seeks to keep Jes Grew in check and maintain order in
society. In the book, Reed portrays this Wallflower Order as the villain, and those
who welcome Jes Grew, such as PaPa LaBas, as heroes. In my opinion, however,
Reed’s argument goes a little too far.
Consider, for example, his
description of the headquarters of the Wallflower Order in Chapter 17. “You
have nothing real up here. Everything is polyurethane, Polystyrene, Lucite,
Plexiglas, acrylate, Mylar, Teflon, phenolic, polycarbonate. A gallimaufry of
synthetic materials. Wood you hate. Nothing to remind you of the Human Seed”
(62). To begin, this idea of the “Human Seed” has the same problem as the
slogan “Make America Great Again” – during the time of the Human Seed, we were
hunter-gatherers who had to fight tooth and nail for survival, and we never had
time to develop the culture of music, dance, and art that Jes Grew represents. It
was only through technology and developments in agriculture that we were able
to amass a surplus of food, giving us enough free time away from the fields to start
the wave of Jes Grew. Secondly, the “gallimaufry of synthetic materials” Reed
lists deserves praise rather than criticism. Just as the ancients used the
resources they had to build buildings out of wood, we are using our resources
to build buildings out of the most effective materials possible. Indeed, there
is nothing natural about living in a wooden house – hypothetically, if we told
some aliens that we sheltered under a plant cut into a bunch of pieces and
stuck together with mud, they would laugh. We built wooden houses for millennia,
however, simply because they were the most prudent and effective form of
shelter. Similarly, our current buildings are made out of the best materials we
have at our disposal. Whether these are synthetic or not is a non-issue, and
while we don’t hate wood, it would be unwise to use it, given that we have
better materials at hand.
The end of this
description, from my point of view, is just as shortsighted. Reed says that “the
Atonists got rid of their spirit 1000s of years ago with Him (…). Death will
have taken over. Why is it Death you like? Because then no 1 will keep you up
all night with all that racket dancing and singing. The next morning you can
get up and build, drill, progress putting up skyscrapers and … and … and …
working and stuff. You know? Keeping busy” (62 – 63). First of all, the idea
that we work just to “keep busy” is ridiculous. I’m sure that Reed enjoyed his
work as an author, and that he didn’t write Mumbo
Jumbo just to keep busy. Indeed, many people are truly passionate about
their work, and they get the same surge of excitement from reading a
thought-provoking article or making a surprising discovery as one might get
from catching Jes Grew. I find it extremely naïve to say that just because someone
doesn’t show their excitement on the outside by singing or dancing, they have
no spirit and are essentially dead. The second half of Reed’s statement, where
he criticizes “progress” as being pointless, and says that doing things like
building skyscrapers is progress solely for the sake of progress, is just as
bad, but perhaps excusable. Reed wasn’t to know when he wrote the book in 1972 that
the modern analog of Jes Grew is a result of technology, and that the
discoveries of those soulless Atonist scientists he just adores would lead to
something called the internet, to YouTube, to iTunes, and so on. Indeed, in
hindsight, we see that it was actually the “progress” so loathed by those who
got caught up in Jes Grew that led to music being so widespread in this day and
age, and that opened up the western world to cultures all across the globe.
A bold statement, from which I assume you are not totally convinced by Mumbo Jumbo. Your point about hard work not being bad came up in 8th period today, how its hard for us, having been raised with a strong work ethic as a thing to be valued, to view this as a villainous trait in Set. While I agree with you in the aspects you've mentioned here, I still think that as long as the main purpose of the Wallflower Order is cultural oppression I can't be in favor of it.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI will begin by warning you that you should never take everything at face value -- just because Reed sets up a biased opposition between Jes Grew and the Atonists doesn’t mean one side will be absolutely “good” and the other absolutely “bad”. Moreover, Reed has revealed himself to be a rather self-critical satirist, meaning I also wouldn’t interpret each of his machinations as direct reflections of his beliefs.
ReplyDeleteIn your second paragraph, I can recognize and appreciate that you’re making a practical argument, however I do think you’ve missed the point of the quote. Look no further than its first sentence: “You have nothing real up here.” Clearly we aren’t supposed to think that Teflon is inherently evil and clearly Jes Grew allies aren’t living in log cabins to invoke the “Human Seed”! The purpose of listing the composition of the Wallflower headquarters is to use the synthetic imagery of its physical form to parallel the synthetic nature of its entire operation. You go on to voice your skepticism and altogether dismissal of hunter gatherer culture, to which I ask, isn’t that going a bit too far? I’m sure there is bountiful evidence pointing to the existence of “music, dance, and art” during this period in human history, even if the progression was (justifiably) more primitive and gradual than in later societies.
I agree with most points you make in that most of the book doesn't exemplify the Wallflower Order as bad, and taking this point of view is understandable. Reed doesn't narrate Hinckle Von Vampton's actions as bad, only giving details of what happened and HVV's mission. And to some extent, he has justification for trying to stop this disease, especially since Reed casts it as a 'disease'. But speaking this way, is there really anything wrong with Donald Trump proposing to stop all Mexicans from coming to the United States, legally or illegally? Is there anything wrong with his position on Muslims in America? To some politicians, definitely not, as we've seen. But to others, including me, there is a point where prevention becomes culturally immoral, and at that point, people like Trump and HVV lose my favor.
ReplyDeleteYou make a number of provocative and compelling points here--a kind of reversal on Reed's reversal of our commonly understood values--but I'm especially struck by your comment on technology, and the unexpected and potentially democrative/Jes Grew-related kinds of freedom it ended up producing in the online age. We see the struggle within this context as well--the Internet was a lot LESS Atonist in its early days, and the commercialization and stratification has changed online culture a lot, and the free-information and other movements can be viewed as a direct challenge to Atonist control (e.g. Aaron Schwartz "liberating" that huge trove of academic articles from their "detention" in JSTOR). So it's become an interesting kind of location *for* the kind of conflict Reed describes. But it's a good point to note how unpredictable such technological advance can be, in terms of the way it actually works in people's lives. Black Lives Matter in its current form would be unimaginable without social media, and we can see the Atonist control of media being weakened by independently produced, self-published news online. And, of course, Reed himself maintains a personal web page, facebook account, etc.
ReplyDelete